Too little info for pre-sequestration layoff warnings, contractors say
By Kedar Pavgi
October 5, 2012 - Government Executive
Boeing Co., General Dynamics and other contractors will not send their
employees layoff warnings in November in anticipation of lost government
contracts resulting from sequestration, representatives from those companies
said.
Rob Doolittle, a spokesman for General Dynamics, said without details about
the across-the-board budget cuts slated to take effect in January, his company
cannot assess the workforce implications.
gWe will not issue notices to our employees unless we have specific
information about what the impact of sequestration will be on our programs, and
we determine that we need to lay off employees as a result of the changes to our
programs,h Doolittle said. gThe Defense Department has not provided information
to General Dynamics about how it intends to implement sequestration with regard
to our programs.h
Amid fears federal contract money will dry up if sequestration is not
averted, contractors have threatened to send employees warning notices according
to the 1988 Worker Adjustment Retraining Notification Act. The WARN Act requires
companies with more than 100 employees to send out notices 60 days ahead of mass
layoffs or plant closures.
The Labor Department has said it is unnecessary and even ginconsistenth with
the law for contractors to send out such notices ahead of the threatened
sequestration because itfs not clear the sequestration actually will happen or
what impact the automatic cuts it triggers would have on individual agency
contracts and companies. Lawmakers hope to come to agreement on an alternative
to sequestration to avoid the potentially haphazard cuts.
The Office of Management and Budget issued
guidance on Sept. 28 saying agencies would cover contractorsf gliability and
litigation costsh related to WARN Act notices if the companies follow Laborfs
guidance. Separately the Defense Department told contractors that it would take
some period of time after a sequester went into effect on Jan. 2, 2013, before
funding for individual programs would be cut.
Like General Dynamic, Boeing said it would need more information before
making workforce determinations. gIt has always been our position that Boeing
would not issue WARN notices to our employees until we receive detailed
guidance from our customers about cuts to specific programs and workforce
actions required to address those cuts,h spokesman Dan Beck said in an email to
Government Executive.
Lockheed Martin Corp., the governmentfs largest contractor, announced Oct.
1 that it would not be issuing WARN Act notices this year. The companyfs top
officials told its employees the governmentfs guidance convinced them the
notices were unnecessary.
When contacted by Government Executive, other corporations, including Booz
Allen Hamilton, did not want to speculate on sequestration-related cuts. During
an earningfs conference call in early August, Booz Allen Hamilton Executive Vice
President Samuel Strickland said the firm was gbeing
cautioush for fiscal 2013.
ITT Exelis also was not intending to issue sequestration-related layoff
notices, citing the governmentfs advice.
gBased on past and more recent government guidance from the Department of
Labor and DoD, ITT Exelis does not currently have (nor have we had in the past)
any intention of issuing pre-emptive sequestration-related WARN notices at this
time,h spokesperson B.J Talley said.
By Kedar Pavgi
October 5, 2012
http://www.govexec.com/contracting/2012/10/too-little-info-pre-sequestration-layoff-warnings-contractors-say/58631/